Thursday, May 10, 2012

From Bill Hooper, treasurer of Calvary, here are meeting notes from the 5/6/12 gathering at St. Paul's.

Please feel free to join the conversation, either her or on Facebook, at https://www.facebook.com/ComingTogetherinFaith


Meeting Notes:  Held at St. Paul’s Sunday 5/6/12 from 3 to 5 PM

1.        Meeting addressed by 4 representative of Holy Spirit Parish, Fall River, MA – the only parish to have merged.  At the onset, there were 4 Parishes considering merger but only 3 followed through to the end.  All of the Churches were physically located in Fall River within a six mile radius of one another.  While all of the Churches may have been considered “neighborhood” churches, few if any members walked to church.  All Churches had cradle to grave members with additional mixtures of younger to older parishioners.  One complaint common to all of the Churches was lack of resources/activities for children and young members.  Each Church’s Pastor was at or very near retirement.

2.        The merger was solely as a result of financial need by the 3 Parish that merged.  One Parish had an endowment but few parishioners; one had a larger number of parishioners but little or no endowment to call upon while the last was near closing its doors.  One of the existing Parishes was considered “High”; one “Low” while the third was a mixture of both.

3.       Each Church’s Vestry recognized that church’s inability to continue operation in the long term and eventually arrived at the conclusion that a merger was the only viable alternative.

4.       The first step in the process was to discern what the various congregations had in common.  A schedule was established to attend one another’s churches on a rotating basis.  Each church would stay “home” for 3 weekends per month then visit and worship at another church one weekend per month – there was a schedule kept for this purpose.

5.       After much discussion and prayerful reflection, three of the four Vestries voted to merge.  The fourth opted to go it alone.  Once again there were lengthy discussion and a lot of prayer and reflection before the Vestries decided that nothing could be accomplished by general consensus of all of the parishioners of the three Parishes so the Vestries agree to the creation of a supernumerary “Interchurch Council” which would make all final decisions after having received input, comments and recommendations from all of the Churches as the need arose during the decision making process.  To cement the commitment, each Vestry voted to cede final authority for merger related decisions to the Interchurch Council and confirmed the vote in writing.

6.       Each Church elected 3 members to sit upon the Interchurch Council.  The Vestries and Council decided immediately that Clergy from the three Churches would not be invited into the decision making process because the people not the clergy are the church.

7.        The Council met regularly to explore what information was needed to decide the actual time line and process for merging.  They considered such questions as:

a.        Which building might be used versus construction or acquiring a new structure.  In the end, an existing church was selected.  Alternatives were too expensive.

b.      How merger related expenses, if any, would be handled.

c.       What would happen with to objects such as altars, statues, furnishing, etc.

d.      Staffing

e.       Disposal of excess real estate.

8.        The Council addressed each issue as the need arose and called upon Diocesan Resource when and as needed, particularly those dealing with legal issues.  Each Sunday, a Council Representative spoke at their respective church to update the congregation.

9.       The Council picked at date to begin combined worship at the “new” church which was a date prior to the actual legal merger.

10.   While not every person from the three parishes was satisfied with all of the decisions made by the Council, a majority of Parishioners from the three parishes joined the “new” parish.  The new parish is growing.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment